Richard Lipski - AP
about 1 month ago: Georgetown's Otto Porter receives congratulations from fans as he walks off the court after they defeated Rutgers 52-50 in an NCAA college basketball game, Saturday, Jan. 21, 2012, in Washington. Porter made two free throws in the final minute to give Georgetown the victory. (AP Photo/Richard Lipski)
Rutgers falls to No. 10 Georgetown, 52-50, as Mike Rice questions two foul calls in final two minutes | NJ.com
"We’re an aggressive team," Rice said. "I guess we’ll have to learn how to play with more toughness in the paint and to finish better. We’re an attack team, so again — I didn’t mind (most of the calls). Again, I could be completely wrong. I’d like to go and look at it before I criticize."
Porter’s big shots save No. 10 Georgetown from becoming Rutgers’ third top-10 victim, 52-50 - The Washington Post
"There were some bizarre plays, some bizarre whistles," Rice said. "Before I get into it, I’d like to look on replay to see if they were the correct call. Because again, we do foul. We did play a lot without a purpose as far as our positioning and playing with our hands instead of our feet and our bodies. But it was interesting the last two minutes."

Debatable call, foul trouble doom Rutgers | The Asbury Park Press NJ | APP.com
"I don’t really know what happened. I just know the ref called a foul," Porter said. "I was just thinking hit the free throws. That’s all I was thinking about it. It just came. I’ve practiced my free throws, and I was able to hit them."
Rutgers Loses to Georgetown 52-50; Rice to Meet with Big East? - On the Banks
It was that kind of afternoon for Rutgers. They were called for a ton of ticky tack fouls--a push-off by Eli Carter late really seemed to get Mike Rice's temper going--while Georgetown was able to manhandle RU's big men down low. At one point, Derrick Randall was mugged 3 times in a row under the basket--no call. On another possession, Greg Lewis gave one of the Hoyas a piggyback ride. No call. If the game was called consistently, Rutgers would have won this one going away.
Otto Porter salvages win for No. 10 Georgetown against Rutgers - Washington Times
With his teammates struggling to hit the broad side of a barn, Whittington stepped up midway through the second half, rattling off seven straight points, including a 3-pointer, to help Georgetown equal the score at 38-38. "I was just doing the things I know I can do," the freshman from Columbia, Md., said. "Coach said be aggressive and play hard defense. I just played defense, and it gave me confidence to make the shots."
Everything lines up at end for Georgetown | Washington Examiner
"We know that there's going to be days like this, and if we just keep playing defense, we can pull out wins," Clark said. "I've had that feeling about our team this whole year. We've been in some tight games, and there's always been a feeling that we're not going to lose this game."
MEN'S BASKETBALL | Hoyas Eke Out Win Over Scarlet Knights - Sports - The Hoya
The freshman duo combined for 16 points and nine rebounds, including six offensive boards. Whittington scored all seven of his points in a two-minute span to tie the game after the Blue and Gray found themselves in a 38-31 hole in the second half.
Rutgers Scarlet Knights vs. Georgetown Hoyas - Recap - January 21, 2012 - ESPN
Georgetown, which entered the game second in the Big East making 37.2 percent of its 3-pointers, missed all eight of its 3-pointers in the first half. But Markel Starks and Jason Clark, the Hoyas' starting backcourt, each made 3-pointers before the second-half's first timeout to shake off a combined 0 for 5 from the field in the first half.
How bad were the Hoyas in the first half against Rutgers? - Georgetown Hoyas - CBSSports.com RapidReports
Coach John Thompson III tried not to think about his team’s 3 of 23 shooting effort in the first half. "I didn’t look at that box score," he said. "This is the second time this year where there was a lid on the basket. The ball just wasn’t going in."
Vox Populi " Postgame Roundup: Hoyas 52, Scarlet Knights 50
For a long stretch in the second half, Thompson used seniors Jason Clark and Henry Sims alongside his three main freshmen. Though the lineup was certainly effective, it was also necessary, as junior Hollis Thompson sat out much of the second half and was not "himself" due to a pulled thigh muscle according to Thompson III. Asked about the lineup, Thompson said that he was going for defense. "At this point of the year, we’re not thinking of anyone as a freshmen," he commented. "I just thought that was our best defensive group. That group was consistently getting stops and I thought they did a very good job."
Hoya Prospectus: Recap: Georgetown 52, Rutgers 50
The problem for Rutgers was two-fold in the second half: Georgetown wasn't missing the easy shots anymore [4/5 on dunks, layups and tips], and had stopped turning over the ball. After committing 9 turnovers on 31 possessions in the first half, the Hoyas finally held onto the ball after intermission, committing only 5 turnovers in their last 29 possessions to claw back into the game, and finally to win it.
Postgame Quotes - GUHoyas.com
Senior Center Henry Sims On the challenge of the aggressive, rotating big men from Rutgers... "Every Big East game is a battle inside. Coach told us going in that their bigs are aggressive and they rotate a lot. My mindset was not to cave into their pressure."
Thompson: 'Our defense won the game for us' - Georgetown Hoyas - CBSSports.com RapidReports
After an offensive performance to forget, coach John Thompson III credited his defense for pulling out the victory against Rutgers. "Our defense won the game for us," he said. "It enabled us to hang around and withstand a day when we were not good offensively."
Escape: Georgetown 52, Rutgers 50 | Over the Hilltop
Georgetown finished a three-game stretch against inferior but tricky teams: St. John’s with young offensive promise; DePaul with harried pressure; and Rutgers with sticky, grabbing defense. As they should have, the Hoyas won all three. Those wins look all the more essential when looking at the standings where, behind the hated (and, alas, undefeated) Orange, there’s a logjam of five teams with two losses apiece.
0 recs | 51 comments
Yesterday I hit my college basketball trifecta
Georgetown win; Syracuse loss; Duke loss — with a UConn loss thrown in for good measure.
who will sex dikembe tonight - January 22, 2012
all to unranked teams
although FSU is well on its way to a deserved ranking
Hire Esherick - January 22, 2012
If the Redskins win today
It would be a perfect sports weekend
who will sex dikembe tonight - January 22, 2012
perfection = Giants over San Fran.
Let’s go Big Blue!
beatcuse - January 22, 2012 via iPhone app
Seems much more likely
who will sex dikembe tonight - January 22, 2012
high comedy from Rutgers blog
CasualHoya - January 22, 2012
Apparently they don't teach the subjunctive at NJ State
who will sex dikembe tonight - January 22, 2012
I also think they should watch out
If BE officials sat down and watched this one, counting every foul committed that wasn’t called, we would get about 15 more on us, and they would receive 30-40 more.
Shoving players when receiving the ball, tripping, and grabbing everything, do not count as ‘ticky tack’.
More like Awesome Freeman - January 22, 2012 via iPhone app
Also, not once did the officials call a foul on a pump fake
It’s on Rutgers to adjust to that.
More like Awesome Freeman - January 22, 2012 via iPhone app
My favorite quote:
“In Big East play, Rutgers has been called for 54 more fouls than its opponents. According to Brendan Prunty, Coach Rice plans to meet with Big East officials to discuss this.”
So, the theory is not only that this game was called by biased refs, but that there is a massive conspiracy in the Big East to call Rutgers for fouls that don’t happen? Yes, yes that makes complete sense.
genetichoya - January 22, 2012
Maybe Rice should just be candid and admit his team strategy is to foul and disrupt the opposing team's offensive flow.
96Hoyagrad - January 22, 2012
he did
which makes the rutgers complaining even more comical. he just wants hockey rules in effect for the last 2 minutes.
monroesrighthand - January 22, 2012
seriously
does anyone really beleive that was a good call or a well officiated game? Be happy with the win, but don’t be such homers and try to justify something that can’t be.
IKE65 - January 22, 2012
dont think the last one should have been called
but it was also a pretty stupid foul
Hire Esherick - January 22, 2012
Agreed
Great majority were legitimate, not sure about that last one, but it was dumb regardless.
JGD - January 22, 2012
You can’t hold and pull in the post..
It is what it is and the game should be officiated the same from tip to tip.. There can’t be different rules for the last 2 minutes..
That being said roles reversed i would be upset too, but it’s no coincidence that Rutgers leads the BE in fouls and are 12th in the nation in that category.
yaboynyp - January 22, 2012
Agreed
they’re just in denial at this point, oh well!
Big Spoon - January 22, 2012
yeah, i thnk if you have a rep as a fouling team
you’re not going to get the benefit of the calls when its close.
SomebodyBuyAustinaSteak - January 22, 2012
Perhaps, just perhaps
the strategy needs to change in order not to look so bad, hopefully they’ll get the picture, but not at the expense of Georgetown though.
Big Spoon - January 22, 2012
And actually had you asked me at the time
I’d have taken not the foul and the chance to take the last shot/overtime instead of giving 7-8 seconds for a tying layup or winning three. With the Rutgers foul situation, overtime would have been a cakewalk.
wadetandy - January 22, 2012 via mobile
agreed
i actually thought that the foul was quite possibly to the benefit of Rutgers, because it put the ball back in their hands — giving them the chance for a win. We wanted to shoot with 2 seconds left. OT was definitely in our favor as momentum had swung our way and their foul situation was about to destroy them.
thunderbus - January 22, 2012
well-officiated? no -- consistent? yes
I thought the officiating was pretty bad, but it was consistently bad on both sides of the ball. All the whining over on the Rutgers blog (fellow Hoya fans: check it out. it’s nauseating) seems to totally ignore the fact that Rutgers has had a huge number of fouls all friggin season. As hoyasincebirth pointed out over there (though none of them ever responded), they had a very similar foul differential in the WV game, but never blamed the refs — because that one wasn’t close. They blamed the referees in this one because it was, even though the foul differential was almost identical. Also, Rutgers is #12 in the country in fouls committed.
We’re not being “homers” by not conceding that we absolutely should have lost if there wasn’t a conspiracy by the refs to defeat Rutgers. We’re merely pointing out that the fact that there was a huge differential in fouls does not indicate that the refs were “favoring” us or “conspiring against” RU — but instead, that it points to the style of defense they’ve played all season.
Anyway, as a ‘cuse fan, don’t you need to be on your own blog breaking down the referee conspiracy against Syracuse or NCAA conspiracy against Fab Melo or drugs put in the team’s gatorade or whatever caused your 9 point beatdown against an unranked ND?
sanityonleave - January 22, 2012
From the other end of the spectrum
Even if we accept the Rutgers fans’ assertion that the game was poorly and inconsistently refereed, here’s the thing: it happens. I’ll be the first to admit that I’ve never played competitive basketball, and therefore might not be the best person to argue about whether or not certain calls are legitimate. But having played competitive sports in general, sometimes you get bad referees or bad calls. They’re humans, and not infallible. It. Happens. It happens to everyone, and it sucks, but that’s life, and life isn’t fair.
I sincerely hope we don’t have to hear this kind of whining all week – the Pitt game can’t come soon enough. In summation: tears can dry, crybabies. Move on.
J-Wall's Mom's Broom - January 22, 2012
just being objective
cuse got their butt kicked by ND, no shame losing in ND whether their ranked or not. My point is that is was a lousy call, one that could be called on nearly every possesion. Trying to defend or justify it seems homerish to me.
IKE65 - January 23, 2012
how dare anyone post homerish and biased comments on a fan blog!?!?
think you should copy and paste what you just wrote on nunes. seems few of your fellow oranges are blaming the refs for the drubbing by nd
Hire Esherick - January 23, 2012
Calls like that happen all the time
Bad call? Fine, and yes it put us in position to win. Last I checked, no one puts an asterisk next to wins like that, that’s just basketball. Did Rutgers “deserve” to be in a position to tie at the end of regulation? That’s a useless and ultimately nonsensical argument to have. We got a call. Situations like that are not uncommon, and we did what we needed to do in order to win the game.
WarmupEwing - January 23, 2012
Homerish???
You mean the fans on this blog are biased?? In favor of Georgetown??? Do tell…
On a side note, he pushed Otto out about 5 feet and he rapped his whole arm around his waste… Basketball rule #4080 You cant hug or grope an opposing player.
Do I like the fact that free throws decided the game? No…
Is it the right call?? Yes…
Does Rutgers have a right to be angry? Yes…
Do you?? Nope
yaboynyp - January 23, 2012
Is that actually the language of the rule?
Because, if so, you have to wonder what inspired them to write it like that…
J-Wall's Mom's Broom - January 23, 2012
Yes, both were correct calls
The 2nd to last one against Carter had to be made, You can’t shove a player and expect not to get called. On the last one against, Poole, yes the ref could have swallowed his whistle but Poole absolutely wrapped his arm around Porter so yes, it’s a foul.
DaymondMyles - January 22, 2012
anyone have a link to someplace i could watch the last foul?
SomebodyBuyAustinaSteak - January 22, 2012
espn highlights.. Just go to the GTown page
yaboynyp - January 22, 2012
highlights dont show that foul
SomebodyBuyAustinaSteak - January 22, 2012
My bad they showed it on SportsCenter.. I’m sure if you troll the Rutgers board
It’s probably posted on the top of the page.. lol.. Rough way to lose though honestly… Rutgers is getting a lot better which is good, but we shot the ball terribly.. smh
yaboynyp - January 22, 2012
the pushoff is worth questioning
but the foul on Otto was consistent to what they were doing and what was called all game long
VictorPage'sLeftEye - January 22, 2012 via Android app
But you have to know better.
Darius Johnson-Odom got called for an offensive for doing the same thing late in the Marquette game. When a game is close, if you try to get an advantage using a stiff arm, you’re going to get called.
More like Awesome Freeman - January 22, 2012
Good lord Baltimore.
shwonkBC - January 22, 2012
That was so, so brutal
Between Evans dropping the ball in the end zone and then the kicker shanking that by a good 30 yards, wow.
JGD - January 22, 2012
I thought evans took two steps with the ball, why wasn't it automatically reviewed?
RileysDressLikeAHoyaJersey - January 22, 2012 via mobile
They don't automatically review incomplete passes
Just scores.
shwonkBC - January 22, 2012
All reviews inside 2:00 are booth reviews.
They review all scoring playing at any time during the game.
RileysDressLikeAHoyaJersey - January 22, 2012 via mobile
he needed to complete the process of the catch
he hadn’t brought the ball into his body yet. definitely not a catch. definitely worst play of the game (yes, worse than the missed FG).
thejerseytornado - January 22, 2012
awful downside to yesterday's win
more, much much more Tyler moobage. At least every time we’re in the hole and needing help, which is likely to be often.
SirHoya - January 22, 2012 via iPhone app
Honestly, I'd put up with a lot worse
if it meant that this team would pull through every tough game. His Moobness Lord Tyler is 2-0 so far (right?) – long may his successful streak continue.
J-Wall's Mom's Broom - January 22, 2012
Just as long as he never sings the national anthem again
Ugh
WarmupEwing - January 22, 2012
rankings
where do we think this shakes out? Losses by #1, #3, #4, #9, #13. Injury to key starter for #8…
A #2 Missouri would be very weird.
hoya07 - January 22, 2012
parrish has gtown at #13
but he had them at 14 last week
http://eye-on-college-basketball.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/26283066/34522662?source=rss_blogs_NCAAB
all he did was drop indiana behind gtown
Hire Esherick - January 22, 2012
kentucky is new #1
IMO. Duke still ranked ahead of us, b/c of Duke homerism. I dont see us moving up much, maybe to 9 or 10
SomebodyBuyAustinaSteak - January 22, 2012
Can't get past #9 solely on the strength of the DePaul and Rutgers games
If we win at Pitt next week, it won’t change much either. Just hold steady until UConn comes to town.
WarmupEwing - January 22, 2012
I say 9… But honestly I don’t care..
Like 3 said let’s just collect wins..
Giants! Legoo
yaboynyp - January 22, 2012
Perhaps 6 nothing less than 8
hopefully the Hoyas don’t get the big-head when they play Pitt! The Hoyas need to continue to have Pitt ‘undefeated’ in the win column.
Big Spoon - January 22, 2012
what the eff
is up with all these damned xfinity ads cutting into the game. We missed an entire OT punt due to one of them. Intentional, or fat fingers in the control room?
SirHoya - January 22, 2012 via iPhone app
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Casual Hoya to post a comment.